ASO comparison
Weblio英語辞書 - 英和辞典 - 和英辞典を多数掲載 vs DeepL Translate
Weblio英語辞書 - 英和辞典 - 和英辞典を多数掲載
★ 4.53 · Reference
DeepL Translate
★ 4.77 · Reference
Leads on public metricsOn public data, DeepL Translate leads on 4/5 metrics. But there’s something to learn from both.
| Metric | Weblio英語辞書 - 英和辞典 - 和英辞典を多数掲載 | DeepL Translate |
|---|---|---|
| Avg rating | 4.53 | 4.77 |
| Ratings | 174 | 13,284 |
| Screenshots | 0 | 0 |
| Update recency | 98d ago | 7d ago |
| Languages | 2 | 17 |
Green = leads on that metric. Based on public App Store data. Blank = unavailable.
Key differences (AI)
App B, DeepL Translate, shows a higher average rating and significantly more ratings compared to App A, Weblio英語辞書. Additionally, DeepL Translate has a more recent update and supports a greater number of languages, indicating a potentially more active development and broader usability.
What Weblio英語辞書 - 英和辞典 - 和英辞典を多数掲載 could adopt
App A could focus on increasing its user ratings and gathering more feedback to enhance its overall rating. Additionally, improving update frequency may help in keeping the app relevant and appealing to users.
What DeepL Translate could adopt
App B could consider adding more visual content, such as screenshots, to better showcase its features and user experience. Maintaining its current update frequency while further expanding its language offerings could also enhance its appeal.
How does your app compare?
Competitor comparison, ASO score, and fixes — free to start.
Diagnose free →* AI-generated comparison based on public App Store info and positive reviews.